In a recent video, Simon Clark explored the transformation of climate denial into a more ominous trend known as “doomism.” The video discussed how the arguments made by climate skeptics have evolved and highlighted the emergence of a growing community of individuals who believe that addressing climate change is futile, pushing society towards an era of climate despair. Here’s the full story.
The Evolution of Climate Denial
Clark began by referencing a report from the Center for Countering Digital Hate, which analyzed the changing narrative of climate denial on YouTube. The study identified a shift from “old denial” – claims that global warming wasn’t happening or wasn’t caused by humans – to “new denial.”
The New Denial
New denial involved arguments that the impact of climate change would be beneficial, that climate solutions wouldn’t work, or that climate science itself was unreliable. This shift, as Clark explained, had given rise to the doomism movement.
The Doomism Movement
Doomism, represented a belief that efforts to address the climate crisis were futile, leading to a sense of hopelessness and despair. Clark pointed out that while old denial focused on disputing the existence of climate change, new denial aimed to instill the idea that even if climate change was acknowledged, nothing could be done about it.
The Influence of YouTube Channels
The video explored the influence of YouTube channels that were once known for old denial and had now transitioned into promoting new denial. Clark highlighted how these channels had shifted their messaging, from outright denial to fostering a sense of doomism.
The Impact on Public Opinion
Clark presented survey data showing that a significant percentage of the population, especially among Gen Z and Millennials, then believed there was no point in changing behavior to limit their impact on the climate. This shift in attitude was attributed to the rise of doomism, actively promoted by online influencers who were previously climate skeptics.
Challenges in Refuting Doomism
The video delved into the challenges of refuting doomism compared to old denial. While personal experiences, like rising temperatures, could convince some skeptics in the past, doomism relied on more intangible arguments, making it harder to counter. Clarks shared that the discourse was now shifting towards arguments that climate solutions were expensive, harmful, and ultimately pointless.
The Role Profit Motives
Clark raised concerns about the role of YouTube, which profited from advertising on videos promoting climate misinformation. He urged the platform to reconsider its advertising policies, given the potential harm caused by the spread of doomist narratives.
Encouraging Action
The video concluded with a call to reject doomism and highlighted the importance of scientific literacy. Clark shared that despite the challenges, there was a reason for hope. He encouraged viewers to support meaningful climate policies, challenge misinformation, and work towards a sustainable future.
Share Your Thoughts
So, what do you think? How could individuals contribute to combating doomism and promoting informed, optimistic action on climate change?
