During a fiery House floor debate, Representative Harriet Hageman (R-WY) strongly advocated for the reversal of a Biden administration rule on EV charger manufacturing in the U.S., calling it a “careless” and “crackpot environmental project” that has already wasted billions of taxpayer dollars. Let’s dive into what she had to say.
Wasteful Spending
As the political battle over environmental policies intensifies, Representative Hageman takes center stage, condemning what she sees as a misguided venture that sacrifices American taxpayer dollars without delivering tangible benefits.
Hageman accuses the Biden administration of persisting in a “crackpot environmental project” despite its apparent failure, highlighting the billions of taxpayer dollars already squandered on federally funded EV charging infrastructure projects.
Foreign Dependency
The representative criticizes the administration’s decision to waive “Buy America” requirements, arguing that this move will produce EV charging infrastructure using foreign materials, ultimately bolstering China’s dominance in the EV manufacturing sector.
Hageman contends that the Biden administration is doubling down on supporting a failing EV industry heavily relying on government subsidies. She suggests that this approach wastes taxpayer money and increases dependence on China and other adversarial nations.
People in the comments mostly agree with Hageman: “Hageman speaks the truth, her words are the exact footprints of true Americans.”
Another commenter added: “Sad times are coming, nothing will stop these people. Did they not get that batteries aren’t good for the environment?”
Some don’t agree with her: “Competing with China; producing a healthier Earth is the more lucrative path.”
And there are some who had some harsh words for her: “We need EV manufacturing here in the U.S. What’s the problem? Oh!! The Big Oil and Gas money is threatened. Grow a spine you useless representatives.”
Energy Poverty Concerns
The representative expresses concerns that the administration’s actions will push millions of Americans into an “energy poverty” state while undermining American sovereignty.
She argues that the focus should be on investing in domestic energy resources and infrastructure rather than sustaining a struggling EV industry.
As Representative Hageman urges her colleagues to support the resolution to reverse the administration’s rule, she emphasizes the need to resist forceful attempts to transition to an electric future without clear benefits. Instead, she advocates for solutions that empower America to restore its energy and manufacturing independence.
What are your thoughts on this topic? Are the billions spent on EV charging infrastructure a wise investment, or is it, as Hageman suggests, a wasteful venture with little to show for it?
How does the decision to waive “Buy America” requirements impact the nation’s ability to control its EV manufacturing and reduce dependence on foreign nations? Is the Biden administration’s focus on the EV industry justified, or should the emphasis be shifted to other domestic energy and infrastructure development areas?
