Florida Governor Ron DeSantis launched the Election Crimes and Security Office two years ago to combat voter and election fraud. Despite its ambitious mission, the office struggles to fill its staff positions, leading to questions about its overall effectiveness and necessity. This report by ABC Action News investigator Katie LaGrone sheds light on the office’s challenges and achievements.
Unfilled Positions

The Election Crimes and Security Office was established with the goal of investigating voter fraud and ensuring the integrity of Florida’s elections. However, LaGrone reports that nearly a quarter of the office’s 18 positions remain vacant. The office currently lacks two inspector specialists, a government operations consultant, and a senior attorney. These vacancies persist despite efforts to improve staffing from a year and a half ago, when only three out of 15 positions were filled.
The Office’s Mission

Governor DeSantis announced the creation of the office as part of a broader effort to safeguard Florida’s elections. The office was intended to provide a centralized resource for investigating election-related crimes and ensuring that any instances of fraud were promptly addressed. Despite this mission, the office’s impact has been questioned, as it struggles to maintain a full roster of employees and produce significant findings.
Criticism of the Office

Broward-based attorney Mike Gottlieb, who represents one of the original 20 former felons arrested as part of the office’s efforts, has been a vocal critic. “I think the office really amounted to much ado about nothing,” Gottlieb said. He argues that there is no widespread evidence of voter fraud, such as ballot box stuffing or mass vote-by-mail fraud, that would justify the office’s existence.
Arrests and Prosecutions

Since its inception, the office has logged 400 complaints this year and made 60 criminal referrals. Of the more than 1,300 complaints received last year, less than half were referred for further action. According to a state spokesperson, the office has achieved at least 25 convictions and over 60 arrests. However, these numbers are not as impressive as anticipated, according to University of Florida political science professor Dan Smith, who notes that similar cases were handled effectively before the office was established.
Ongoing Legal Challenges

Two years after the initial arrests, half of the 20 former felons targeted have pled guilty or been found guilty but received little to no punishment. The remaining cases, including that of Gottlieb’s client, are still pending. Gottlieb plans to continue fighting the charges, emphasizing that it is a “fight worth having.”
Staffing Shortages

When asked about the staffing shortages, a Department of State spokesperson claimed that the office is nearly at full capacity as they approach the primary election and are actively building their team. However, LaGrone’s organizational chart shows several key positions remain unfilled, suggesting that the office is not yet fully operational.
Questionable Necessity

The ongoing staffing challenges and questionable necessity of Florida’s Election Crimes and Security Office highlight potential inefficiencies within the state’s approach to addressing voter fraud. Critics argue that resources might be better allocated elsewhere, given the lack of significant findings and continued vacancies.
Election Integrity

The controversy surrounding the office’s effectiveness raises broader questions about the balance between ensuring election integrity and avoiding unnecessary expenditure on initiatives with minimal impact. As the office continues to struggle with staffing and producing results, these questions become increasingly relevant for policymakers and voters alike.
Impact on Voter Confidence

The establishment of the Election Crimes and Security Office was intended to bolster voter confidence in Florida’s elections. However, its struggles may have the opposite effect, leading to skepticism about the state’s ability to effectively address election-related issues. Ensuring the office operates effectively and transparently is crucial to maintaining public trust in the electoral process.
Moving Forward

As the office continues to address its staffing and operational challenges, it is essential to evaluate its impact and effectiveness. Policymakers must carefully consider the costs and benefits of maintaining the office and explore alternative approaches to ensuring election integrity. Lessons learned from Florida’s experience could inform future efforts in other states and help balance the need for security with the efficient use of resources.
Improving the Staffing Situation

What do you think? How can Florida’s Election Crimes and Security Office improve its staffing situation to become fully operational? What measures can be taken to ensure that the office focuses on genuine instances of voter fraud without infringing on voting rights? How do the current operations of the office compare to previous methods of handling election-related offenses in Florida?
Explore the full insights by viewing the video on ABC Action News’ YouTube channel here.