In recent years, the growth of surveillance technology in the United States has raised significant concerns about privacy and civil liberties. As government agencies increasingly partner with tech companies, the lines between safety and surveillance have blurred, leading some to question whether the U.S. is heading down a path similar to China’s. VICE News’ Krishna Andavolu investigates this complex landscape, exploring the implications of mass surveillance and the uneasy alliance between the government and Big Tech.
Expanding Surveillance at Airports
As Andavolu reports, one of the most visible examples of increased surveillance is found at airports across the U.S., where biometric systems are now commonplace. Officer Diane Sabatino, Deputy Executive Assistant Commissioner for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, explains that these systems compare live photos with existing passport photos to confirm travelers’ identities. While Sabatino emphasizes that this “comparison” is distinct from surveillance, the technology is undeniably rooted in facial recognition, a concept that often evokes concerns about privacy and overreach.
The Southern Border’s Surveillance Hub
The U.S.-Mexico border is a hotspot for surveillance innovation, as the government deploys advanced technology to manage record numbers of migrants. Mariana Trevino Wright, Executive Director of the National Butterfly Center in Texas, describes the border region as a place where constant surveillance is the norm. Trevino Wright lives and works under the watchful eye of Customs and Border Protection (CBP), who she claims monitors residents and collects information without consent or warrants.
Civil Liberties at Risk
Trevino Wright highlights the invasive nature of surveillance along the border, revealing that CBP’s jurisdiction extends 100 miles inland, affecting two-thirds of the U.S. population. She has discovered multiple recording devices on her property and suspects that the government is collecting information on her and others living near the border. “Just by virtue of living near the border, you’re subject to all this surveillance,” Andavolu notes, describing the situation as a “civil liberties nightmare.”
Parallels with China
The expansion of surveillance technology in the U.S. draws unsettling comparisons to China’s pervasive surveillance state, where citizens are subject to extensive tracking through facial recognition and social credit systems. Trevino Wright warns that the U.S. could follow a similar path, raising alarms about the potential erosion of privacy and freedom. “No, we absolutely will,” she asserts when asked if the U.S. could become like China.
The Role of Big Tech
Silicon Valley companies like Palantir Technologies play a significant role in advancing government surveillance capabilities. Palantir, founded by Peter Thiel and Joe Lonsdale, is known for its powerful data analytics software, which has been used in high-profile government operations, including the capture of Osama bin Laden. Former Palantir engineer Filip Sufitchi explains that the company’s technology can analyze vast amounts of data with remarkable efficiency, granting the government unprecedented power over individuals.
Surveillance in Everyday Life
Surveillance technology is not limited to government use. In cities like Peachtree Corners, Georgia, private companies are developing and testing advanced surveillance systems, such as Flock Safety’s license plate readers. These systems capture data that can be used by law enforcement to solve crimes, but they also raise questions about privacy and the potential for misuse. Brandon Barnham, Chief Technology Officer of Peachtree Corners, acknowledges the fine line between safety and privacy, emphasizing the importance of trust and transparency.
The Dangers of Unchecked Surveillance
Andavolu discusses the integration of public and private surveillance systems in cities like Atlanta, where Operation Shield has combined over 10,000 cameras into a single network. Andrew Ferguson, a law professor, warns that the collection of public data is largely unregulated, creating opportunities for government overreach. “If a government wanted to start taking the data that’s available in the world and centralize it and make it usable, which is exactly what Palantir and other companies like Palantir can do, it’s obviously troubling,” Ferguson states.
A Call for Vigilance
While some argue that surveillance is necessary for national security, critics caution against sacrificing privacy in the name of safety. Ferguson urges a reevaluation of the adoption of surveillance technologies, suggesting that citizens assume the worst-case scenario to prevent potential abuse. “Assume the Tyrant,” he advises, highlighting the need for thoughtful consideration before implementing such systems.
“An Invasion of Personal Privacy”
People in the comments shared their thoughts: “It’s surveillance, no matter how you wanna say it. It’s an invasion of personal privacy to be ourselves.”
Another person pointed out: “Just to be very clear, in case anyone overlooked this, the surveillance is not on the billionaires. Their lives are more completely held in private spaces, and they have teams of lawyers to ensure they’re not being tracked in the same way everyone else is if they choose not to be. This is, ultimately, surveillance of working- and middle-class people.”
Moving Forward
As surveillance technology continues to evolve, it is crucial to balance the benefits of enhanced security with the protection of individual rights. Trevino Wright’s message to those listening in underscores the tension between citizens and surveillance: “F*** off,” she says defiantly. This complex landscape demands careful navigation to ensure that privacy and civil liberties are preserved in the face of rapid technological advancement.
Role of Big Tech
What are your thoughts? What responsibilities do tech companies have in ensuring their technologies are not misused by governments or other entities? How should surveillance technologies be regulated to prevent potential abuses and protect civil liberties? How can citizens become more informed about surveillance practices and their implications for privacy and freedom?
Find out more by watching the full video on VICE News’ YouTube channel here.
